crystol-title-company-overview
crystol-title-tailored-advice
crystol-title-animation2
crystol-title-news-main
crystol-title-tailored-advice2
crystol-title-case-studies-main

Ghana’s Supreme Court cites Crystol Energy research on fiscal-stabilisation clauses

The Supreme Court of Ghana has handed down a landmark judgment confirming that Parliament-ratified petroleum agreements—and the fiscal stabilisation clauses they contain—override subsequent changes to national tax legislation.

To explain what a stabilisation clause is and why it matters, the Court quoted directly a 2016 study published by the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, co-authored by Dr Carole Nakhle (CEO, Crystol Energy) and Dr Mario Mansour (Division Chief, IMF Fiscal Affairs). The paper defines a stabilisation clause as “a contractual risk-mitigating device to protect investments from variations in the legal environment. This would include risks deriving from a possible exercise of host state sovereignty such as: expropriation, the obsolescence bargain, or any other change which the government might utilize in order to impose new requirements on investors.”

This citation cements the paper’s status as a go-to reference for policymakers, counsel and investors drafting or renegotiating petroleum agreements worldwide.

Key takeaways from the cited paper:

  1. Freeze clauses often melt: Absolute “tax-freeze” promises seldom survive long in practice.
  2. Share-the-gain works—if trusted: Symmetric, outcome-based clauses can benefit both sides (government and investor) when legal institutions are credible.
  3. Built-in flex beats fine print: Progressive tax regimes that auto-adjust with oil price fluctuations provide steadier certainty than pages of legal wording.
  4. Simple rules, few changes: One transparent model and minimal tinkering best preserve investor confidence and national competitiveness.

Dr Carole Nakhle drilled into these themes in an Extractives Hub webinar, joined by Professor Peter Cameron — Professor of International Energy Law & Policy and Director of CEPMLP — and Dr Victoria R. Nalule, CEO of Nalule Energy & Minerals Consultants (NEM Energy). Together they contrasted host-government and IOC views on stabilisation clauses, weighed their real-world effectiveness, and shared negotiation tactics for tougher contracts. Watch the full discussion in the video below.

Share this:

Recent Posts

SPE Tech Talks

Crystol Energy is proud to announce its collaboration with the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE). The energy transition and the transformation of our global and

Read More »

Categories